Rebecca

 

August 25, 2011

The U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon spoke during a visit to the US Department of Energy’s National Renewable Energy Lab (NREL), stating that “providing clean, renewable energy to 1.4 billion people who are living without electricity is the number one priority of the United Nations.”

The General Assembly has declared next year as the “International Year for Sustainable Energy,” in order to reach sustainable energy for all by 2030. Ban Ki-Moon’s Advisory Group on climate change and energy have recommended and adopted the following strategy: realize universal access to energy by 2030, double energy efficiency by 2030, and double renewable energy share in the global energy mix which is currently at 6% of overall energy.

To view the article and video of Ban Ki-Moon’s speech click here

U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, left, and NREL Director Dan Arvizu talk on their way to a solar equipment demonstration. Credit: Dennis Schroeder

 

Slovak Mission to the UN & NGO Sustainability

Invite you to a presentation on

S.T.A.R. ISLAND

Sustainable Terrain and Resources

The  world’s first completely sustainable, carbon neutral, exotic, island resort

Speaker: David Sklar, President, Lead Designer, Star Island

September 7, 2011

1:15-2:45 pm

U.N. Conference Room: TBA

 

EU Pushes for More Energy Efficiency – By: Rona Fried, PH.D.

In 2008, the European Union launched an energy efficiency plan to 2020. The plan aims to increase renewable energy to 20 percent of overall use, reduce greenhouse gas emissions 20 percent below 1990 levels, and increase energy efficiency by 20 percent compared to business-as-usual projections.

The first two targets are on track to being achieved due to the fact that they are legally binding. The third goal is on track as well, but only reaching a target of 10 percent increase. The new energy efficiency plan is focusing on the three main sources of energy consumption: buildings, transportation, and industry.

However, research is showing that the calculations used to measure success may need to be revised. Developing countries are exempt from reporting emissions under the Kyoto Protocol, while industrialized countries only report emissions that are produced within their borders. Therefore, while emissions may appear to be declining, they may actually be increasing.

 

Solar in Nepal: Small Systems, Big Benefits – By: David G. Hill, PH.D.

Across the globe, roughly 1.5 billion people still live without access to electricity. David and his teenaged son, Mason, believe that supporting economic development and the use of renewable energy in rural communities is extremely important. Nepal, in addition to having a wealth of hydropower potential, also has a very good solar resource equivalent to sunny areas in Colorado, Texas, and California. They decided to focus their attention on two broad objectives in Nepal: to complete at least one household project in Lahachowk and to complete at least one health post installation in Nele Bazzar. The possibilities included larger-capacity systems to support lighting and vaccine refrigeration at health posts, and systems sufficient to support computers and lighting at schools.

These projects were made possible through the Himalayan Light Foundation (HLF), a non-profit, non-governmental organization that has run solar programs for more than 15 years in Nepal and Southeast Asia, these projects were made possible. By selecting relatively small-scale projects, they were able to provide five communities with basic lighting services that will benefit thousands of people. Local partners, Young Star Club (YSC) technicians have helped install each project and are available for maintenance and expansion of the systems, for the future.

 

Technological Green Race

July 18, 2011

The World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) is one of the world’s most influential business coalitions. Currently, businesses are pushing each other to become more sustainable because it is fiscally and socially responsible. However, in order to succeed, businesses and governments must partner and work together towards their sustainable development targets. Winning the “green race” will mean transforming the world market through innovation, creating demand for resource-efficient and low-pollution solutions.

 

Wesley Bedrosian, NYT

Life After Land

July 18, 2011

Rosemary Rayfuse writes, “If the international community cannot or will not slow global warming, the least it can do is help those states prepare for life after land by recognizing a new category of state:  the deterritorialized state.”  Nations now risk becoming inhabitable and the article calls the UN to insist that the nation states maintain their sovereignty.  Proposed solutions:  try to acquire territory from another state, build artificial islands, or they could enter into a federation with another state.

Sizzle Factor for a Restless Climate

July 19, 2011

Shifting weather patterns influence energy demand, affect crop productivity and lead to weather-related disasters.  The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration show that the U.S. climate of the last 10 years was 1.5 degrees warmer than that of the 1970’s and the warmest since the first decade of the last century.  Based on climate history from NOAA it can help project what future Julys might look like.  By 2050, if business as usual persists, New Yorker can expect the number of days in July exceeding 95 degrees to triple.

U.S. and Europe Battle Over Carbon Fees for Airlines

July 27, 2011

January 1, the European Union will require all carriers entering or leaving its airports to either reduce their emissions or pay a charge.  The United States airline industry has argued that the E.U. has no legal right to regulate American carriers and the emissions that are released over other countries or into international airspace.  The E.U. might impose a landing charge instead.  Annie Petsonk, a lawyer who attended for the Environmental Defense Fund, said: “The E.U. system is not a tax — if you don’t want to pay you can reduce your emissions.”

According to the New York Times editorial, Airlines and Carbon, due to absence of a global deal to limit greenhouse gas emissions, the European Union’s plan is a reasonable attempt to address an urgent problem.  However, its facing enormous opposition:  China has threatened a trade war and India is protesting.

 

July 20, 2011

United Nations Security Council, Open Debate on the “Maintenance of International Peace and Security: the Impact of Climate Change”

Roma and her Interns attending the Security Council debate on July 20, 2011

The objective for the United Nations Security Council’s open debate on the subject of “Maintenance and international peace and security: the impact of climate change” on July 20, 2011 was addressed in a letter written by the current President of the Security Council and Permanent Representative of Germany, Peter Wittig. In his communication to the Secretary-General, Mr. Wittig said the debate would include the issues of rising sea levels and the reduction of food production as they are linked to climate change and the resulting effects on peace and security. Also included in this regard would be how the United Nations and other agencies can work to prevent conflict and build peace. Although the representatives discussed some of these topics, there was no consensus as to whether or not climate change is an appropriate subject for the Security Council.

Rather, many representatives felt that this issue should be confined to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development (UNCSD.)

The meeting began with an address by the UN Secretary General, Ban Ki-Moon saying that, “Sustainable development is the defining issue of our time.” He was then followed by the Executive Director of United Nations Environment Program (UNEP), Achim Steiner, who gave an in-depth analysis on climate change. Mr. Steiner explained that the “Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) remains, for the international community, the first point of reference in terms of determining what science can tell us today and what science can not yet tell us.” As of now, the IPCC tells us that on average, the planet’s warming is increasing by .3 degrees per decade, nearly twice the temperature increase seen over the last 100 years. As a result of this warming, sea levels are bound to rise 1 meter by the end of the century, which will undoubtedly cause conflict and displacement, especially for the Small Island States.

Although many representatives, such as the United States, expressed their concern with climate change, countries such as China and Russia believed that this topic should only be dealt with in terms of sustainable development and not security. Climate change, however; is and has been threatening every aspect of our lives from food security to resource management and as the United Kingdom stated, a threat multiplier.

As many countries during the debate continued to agree that climate change is an important issue, the President of Nauru, Marcus Stephen, representing fourteen Small Island Developing States (SIDS), made a dramatic call for action, imploring that these states are at risk of disappearing or losing significant territory to rising sea levels. Carbon dioxide has caused unavoidable impacts affecting food security, water security and public safety.  In order to begin protection of the small island states, President Stephen suggested that the Security Council and other organizations, such as the UNFCCC, must analyze the projected security impacts and learn how to respond to them. In addition, he reiterated the suggestion that “the Council should start by requesting the immediate appointment of a special representative on climate and security. This individual’s primary responsibility should be to analyze projected security impacts of climate change so that the Council and all Member States can understand what lies ahead.”

In addition, President Marcus insisted that “the Council should also request an assessment of the capacity of the United Nations system to respond to these impacts, so that vulnerable countries can be assured that it is up to the task.”

Even though this debate concluded with no consensus, the Security Council understands the importance of following climate change as the possible adverse effects may in the long run aggravate certain existing threats to international peace and security.

 

 

© 2011 NGO Sustainability, Inc., a registered 501(c)3 organization. Site Development and Customization by J. Austin, ngo411.com Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha